FWGNA > Species Accounts > Physidae > Physa pomilia
Physa pomilia Conrad 1834
“Physella heterostropha pomilia” 
  • click to view larger

> Habitat & Distribution

Populations of P. pomilia are moderately widespread on the margins of slow-moving rivers in the lower piedmont and coastal plain from Georgia to eastern Maryland.  Snails are typically found on emergent vegetation and debris in quiet backwaters.  Bona fide P. pomilia populations are also occasionally found in east Tennessee and in Gulf drainages from Alabama to Texas, but longtime confusion with P. acuta has left the range of the species through the U.S. interior very poorly documented.  FWGNA incidence rank I-4.

> Ecology & Life History

Our laboratory cultures of P. pomilia  reach maturity only 5 – 6 weeks post hatch, and shell length of only 5 – 6 mm. This is about two weeks earlier and 1 – 2 mm smaller than typical P. acuta raised under similar conditions.

> Taxonomy & Systematics

Although outwardly quite similar to P. acuta, sequence data and penial morphology both confirm that P. pomilia is distinct (Wethington 2004a, Wethington & Lydeard 2007).  Our laboratory mating experiments (Dillon et al. 2007) have returned evidence of both premating and postmating reproductive isolation between acuta and pomilia as well.

The taxonomic history of P. pomilia is a long and checkered one (Wethington et al. 2009). click for largerConrad originally described P. pomilia from Randons Creek near Claiborne, Alabama.  Clench (1925) described a subspecies, P. pomilia hendersoni, from Yemassee, Beaufort County, South Carolina. George Te (1978) synonymized pomilia under heterostropha and raised hendersoni to the rank of full species. It was this Te classification of the Physidae that was adopted by Burch in his influential (1980, 1982) monograph of the North American freshwater snails.

Dillon et al. (2002) showed, however, that P. heterostropha is a synonym of the cosmopolitan P. acuta.  So in older versions of this website (prior to 3/04), I recognized three physids in South Carolina: P. acuta, P. hendersoni, and the undescribed species A.  But Dillon, Robinson & Wethington (2007)  have recently completed a series of mate choice tests and no-choice breeding studies confirming Clench’s (1925) impression that hendersoni populations from Yemassee are not reproductively isolated from P. pomilia collected at its Alabama type locality. Our South Carolina populations are at best subspecies of P. pomilia.

For notes regarding the placement of pomilia in the genus Physa, rather than Physella, see my essay of 12Oct07 below.

> Supplementary Resources [PDF]

> Essays

> References

Burch, J., and J. Tottenham (1980) North American freshwater snails: species list, ranges, and illustrations. Walkerana 3: 1-215. 
Burch, J. B. (1982) North American freshwater snails: Identification keys, generic synonymy, supplemental notes, glossary, references, index. Walkerana 4: 216 - 365. 
Burgarella, C.  et al. (2015) Molecular evolution of freshwater snails with contrasting mating systems.  Mol. Biol. Evol. 32(9): 2403 - 2416.
Clench, W. J. (1925) Notes on the genus Physa with descriptions of three new subspecies. Occas. Pprs. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 161: 1 – 10.
Dillon, R. T., J. D. Robinson, and A. R. Wethington (2007)  Empirical estimates of reproductive isolation between the freshwater pulmonates Physa acuta, P. pomilia, and P. hendersoni.  Malacologia 49: 283-292.  [PDF]
Dillon, R. T., A. R. Wethington, and C. Lydeard (2011)  The evolution of reproductive isolation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite, the freshwater snail Physa.  BMC Evolutionary Biology 11:144. [PDF] [html]
Dillon, R. T., Jr., A. R. Wethington, J. M. Rhett, and T. P. Smith (2002) Populations of the European freshwater pulmonate Physa acuta are not reproductively isolated from American Physa heterostropha or Physa integra.  Invert. Biol. 121(3):226-234. [PDF]
 Te, G. A. (1975)  Michigan Physidae, with systematic notes on Physella and Physodon (Basommatophora:  Pulmonata). Malacological Review 8(1-2):7-30. 
Te, G. A. (1978) The systematics of the family Physidae (Basommatophora:  Pulmonata). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, pp. 325. 
Te, G. A. (1980) New classification for the family Physidae (Pulmonata:  Basommatophora). Arch. Moll. 110:179-184.
Wethington, A. R. (2004a)
Phylogeny, taxonomy, and evolution of reproductive isolation in Physa (Pulmonata: Physidae)  Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
Wethington, A. R. (2004b)  Family Physidae. A supplement to the workbook accompanying the FMCS Freshwater Identification Workshop, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa. 24 pp. [PDF]
Wethington, A. R. & C. Lydeard (2007)  A molecular phylogeny of Physidae (Gastropoda: Basommatophora) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences.  J. Molluscan Stud. 73: 241 - 257. [PDF]
Wethington, A.R., J. Wise & R. T. Dillon, Jr. (2009)  Genetic and morphological characterization of the Physidae of South Carolina, with description of a new species.  Nautilus 123: 282-292.  [PDF]